Alex_Silva Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 (edited) Salut! As vrea sa stiu ce parere aveti de metoda asta de montare a corzilor.Aduce vreo schimbare semnificativa? Edited August 26, 2010 by Alex_Silva
Guest Baumwolle Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 Pãrerea mea este cã diferența, deși existã, în favoarea top-wrapping-ului, nu este semnificativã, uneori fiind chiar imperceptibilã. Dar dacã Duane o folosea, noi de ce n-am face-o?
Radu Burcea Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 Pãrerea mea este cã diferența, deși existã, în favoarea top-wrapping-ului, nu este semnificativã, uneori fiind chiar imperceptibilã. Dar dacã Duane o folosea, noi de ce n-am face-o? Poate spun prostii(nu am fost si nici nu sunt posesor de LP),insa cred ca in felul asta e tensiune mai mica in corzi,fiindca nu mai e unghiul pe care il formau in montarea "clasica" ci vin aproape paralele de pe stop bar spre tune-o-matic fata de corp. Nu aruncati cu rosii .
karpi Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 (edited) Les Paul, requested the tail be top wrapped to allow him to easily palm mute the strings. In 1952, Gibson got it wrong, and under wrapped the strings. Gibson corrected it the next year. The wrap tail acted as the bridge at that time so it was positioned at scale length, 24-? inches from the nut. When the Tune-o-matic bridge was invented, the tail was moved back and the bridge was installed at scale length. With the strings now going over the bridge, it was no longer necessary to top wrap the stop tail. For Gibson models without a bridge today, it is still necessary to top wrap the stop tail. For Gibson models with a bridge, it is an option. Edited August 26, 2010 by karpi
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now